• Home
  • About Me
  • Experience

EarthSpin

Science Concepts for the Masses

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

When It’s Story Time, Animated Books Are Better for Learning

12/20/2019 by Stacy W. Kish

Emilie O’Leary and her son Jack O’Leary reading on Tuesday, Dec. 10, 2019 in the Children’s School

Researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that digital storybooks that animate upon a child’s vocalization offer beneficial learning opportunities, especially for children with less developed attention regulation. 

“Digital platforms have exploded in popularity, and a huge proportion of the top-selling apps are educational interfaces for children,” said Erik Thiessen, associate professor of Psychology at CMU’s Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences and senior author on the paper. “Many digital interfaces are poorly suited to children’s learning capacities, but if we can make them better, children can learn better.”

The results are available in in the December 19 issue of the journal Developmental Psychology. 

Shared book reading is a quiet moment that provides a child with the fundamental foundation for developing reading and language skills. The rise of digital platforms, like electronic books, computers, smartphones and tablets, have raised concerns that children may be missing out on this key learning experience.

“Children learn best when they are more involved in the learning process,” Thiessen said. “It is really important for children to shape their environment through their behavior to help them learn.”

The researchers constructed the study in three parts that build on previous results. In the first experiment, an adult read to the child from either a traditional hardboard book or a digital book.  In the digital platform, the pertinent noun/verb and a relevant image are animated upon the child’s first vocalization. They found the recall improved using the digital platform compared to the traditional book (60.20 percent to 47.35 percent, respectively). 

“This kind of contingent responsiveness from our digital book (or from a parent or teacher) is rewarding.  And reward has lots of positive effects on learning.  As we get reinforcement, the brain releases dopamine that can serve as a signal for learning at the synaptic level,” Thiessen said. “At the cognitive level, reward promotes maintenance of attention to help the child focus on what is important, which could be especially important for children who have less well developed attentional control.”

The second experiment delved deeper to evaluate whether the positive results from the first experiment were an artifact of the novel experience using a digital platform. The researchers compared two digital books — one static and one animated. Again, children’s recall improved using the animated digital platform (64.72 percent to 45.89 percent, respectively).

Finally, the researchers explored the role of animations in recall and attention. They compared two digital storybooks — one that animates at the start of the page and one that animates upon an appropriate child vocalization. Children’s recall was higher for the digital book that animated with the child’s vocalization (59.42 percent compared to 45.13 percent).

In every experiment, children experienced better recall for stories when they were able to exert active control on the animations in the storybook. According to Thiessen, positive reinforcement enhances the learning experience as do the animated visuals, which integrate nonverbal information and language into the mix. This approach was also particularly beneficial for children who experience difficulty focusing.

“Contingent positive reinforcement may be especially useful for children with lower attentional control because it facilitates learning by directing children’s attention to relevant content,” said Cassondra Eng, graduate student in Thiessen’s lab and first author on the paper. “The contingent responses may provide children with feelings of accomplishment and may serve as positive reinforcement, which in turn enhance learning.” 

Each experiment consisted of a unique cohort of approximately 30 young children (3-5 years old). For each iteration, the children were read two books (each 14 pages) following a structured approach by the adult reader. After the story, the child was asked ten questions to evaluate story recall. 

While this study found animated digital storybooks are beneficial for children, especially children with lower attention skills, the study did not explore why this approach proved to be advantageous. The study did require children to recall information through identification and description, which has proven to be a valid approach to identify a children’s competency in understanding the story. 

Speech recognition software was inadequate to animate the digital platforms automatically. For the study, a researcher initiated the animations manually upon an appropriate vocalization from the child. Current work in the lab is focused on building an interface with fully automatic speech recognition capacities. 

###

Thiessen and Eng were joined by Anthony Tomasic at ARICA IoT on this project, titled “Contingent Responsivity in E-books Modeled from Quality Adult-Child Interactions: Effects on Children’s Learning and Attention.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Blinding People with Science, Psychology | 1 Comment

One Response

  1. on 12/20/2019 at 1:15 pm mirrorgirl's avatar mirrorgirl

    Interning read!



Comments are closed.

  • Archives

    • October 2025 (1)
    • February 2025 (1)
    • August 2024 (1)
    • April 2024 (2)
    • October 2023 (1)
    • August 2023 (2)
    • April 2023 (2)
    • March 2023 (1)
    • February 2023 (1)
    • November 2022 (1)
    • October 2022 (2)
    • September 2022 (1)
    • August 2022 (4)
    • June 2022 (1)
    • March 2022 (1)
    • January 2022 (1)
    • December 2021 (1)
    • October 2021 (2)
    • September 2021 (1)
    • August 2021 (1)
    • June 2021 (2)
    • May 2021 (2)
    • April 2021 (2)
    • March 2021 (1)
    • February 2021 (1)
    • December 2020 (2)
    • April 2020 (2)
    • December 2019 (1)
    • November 2019 (2)
    • October 2019 (1)
    • February 2019 (2)
    • December 2018 (1)
    • September 2018 (1)
    • August 2018 (2)
    • June 2018 (1)
    • May 2018 (2)
    • August 2017 (1)
    • July 2017 (1)
    • November 2014 (2)
    • June 2014 (29)
    • March 2010 (2)
    • February 2010 (1)
    • December 2009 (1)
    • October 2009 (1)
    • August 2009 (1)
  • Categories

    • Blinding People with Science (18)
    • Climate (21)
    • Food (19)
    • Genetics (13)
    • Geology (7)
    • Medicine (19)
    • Nutrition and Health (21)
    • Physics (7)
    • Plants (14)
    • Psychology (3)
    • Uncategorized (1)
  • Pages

    • About Me
    • Experience

Blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


  • Reblog
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • EarthSpin
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • EarthSpin
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d